Rule of Engagement

Now that I have gone through a deposition and dealt with lawyers or the literal pronouncement of that word " Liers " I see how they taint their questions: with preface statements and generalizations. Their perceived powers lie in intimidation and our acceptance of an unspoken rule of misguided admiration for these officers of the court. They create an atmosphere that is artificial and is easily piece if one question's their reality. Just this morning I received a call from an insurance para legal agent. I was rear ended by a pickup and I am seeing a doctor for my pain. The agent asked if I ever had pain in my back before.
I answered, " What part of the back are you referring to. Everybody has had back pain."
She answered, " I never have ."
I asked her , her age and she replied pretty old. I then told her that she had back problems, at her age. If she chose to acknowledge them or treat them, that was another matter. But she had back problems. It the normal process of our bodies to deteriorate. The question is, was it functional, was the back giving any trouble or limiting movement.

summary of topics:

1. perhaps possible but not probable
2. injured before no during which injury new one or old one.
3. Character referrence asks if act or personal opinion , lialist or a lawyers ploy
4. silencecan be condoning a lie.
5. Don't remember because it did not happen but because it did happen cause memory impairment.
6. Not conscious of pain shock and confusion mask feeling of pain.